תענית דף כא

Taanis 21

דף יומי שיעור אויף אידיש · תענית דף כא

Daf Yomi shiur on Maseches Taanis daf 21 (מסכת תענית דף כא), in Yiddish, by HaRav Avrohom Karp ZT"L. The Gemara page, Rashi and Tosafos follow along as you listen, with the English translation alongside.

משום דנפישי בני חילא דמחוזא. אילפא ורבי יוחנן הוו גרסי באורייתא, דחיקא להו מילתא טובא, אמרי: ניקום וניזיל וניעבד עיסקא ונקיים בנפשין ״אפס כי לא יהיה בך אביון״. אזלו, אותיבו…

The same discussion elsewhere in Shas

Taanis 21: the daf with times in the shiur

Tap a time to hear Rabbi Karp's explanation of that passage.

תענית כא · עמוד א

משום דנפישי בני חילא דמחוזא.

due to the fact that there are many soldiers in the city of Meḥoza, and if I let them all eat, they will take all the food I own.

▶ 0:10

אילפא ורבי יוחנן הוו גרסי באורייתא, דחיקא להו מילתא טובא, אמרי: ניקום וניזיל וניעבד עיסקא ונקיים בנפשין ״אפס כי לא יהיה בך אביון״. אזלו, אותיבו תותי גודא רעיעא,

§ The Gemara relates another story that involves an unstable wall. Ilfa and Rabbi Yoḥanan studied Torah together, and as a result they became very hard-pressed for money. They said: Let us get up and go and engage in commerce, and we will fulfill, with regard to ourselves, the verse: “Although there should be no needy among you” (Deuteronomy 15:4), as we will no longer be complete paupers. They went and sat under a dilapidated wall and were eating bread, when two ministering angels arrived.

▶ 0:57

הוו קא כרכי ריפתא, אתו תרי מלאכי השרת.

▶ 1:11

שמעיה רבי יוחנן דאמר חד לחבריה: נישדי עלייהו האי גודא ונקטלינהו, שמניחין חיי עולם הבא ועוסקין בחיי שעה! אמר ליה אידך: שבקינהו, דאיכא בהו חד דקיימא ליה שעתא.

Rabbi Yoḥanan heard that one angel said to the other: Let us knock this wall down upon them and kill them, as they abandon eternal life of Torah study and engage in temporal life for their own sustenance. The other angel said to him: Leave them, as there is one of them whose time of achievement stands before him, i.e., his time has yet to come. Rabbi Yoḥanan heard all this, but Ilfa did not hear the angels’ conversation. Rabbi Yoḥanan said to Ilfa: Did the Master hear anything? Ilfa said to him: No. Rabbi Yoḥanan said to himself: Since I heard the angels and Ilfa did not hear, I can learn from this that it is I whose time of achievement stands before me.

▶ 2:33

רבי יוחנן שמע, אילפא לא שמע. אמר ליה רבי יוחנן לאילפא: שמע מר מידי? אמר ליה: לא. אמר מדשמעי אנא ואילפא לא שמע,

▶ 2:56

שמע מינה לדידי קיימא לי שעתא.

▶ 3:04

אמר ליה רבי יוחנן: איהדר, ואוקי בנפשאי ״כי לא יחדל אביון מקרב הארץ״. רבי יוחנן הדר, אילפא לא הדר. עד דאתא אילפא, מליך רבי יוחנן.

Rabbi Yoḥanan said to Ilfa: I will return home and fulfill with regard to myself the contrary verse: “For the poor shall never cease out of the land” (Deuteronomy 15:11). Rabbi Yoḥanan returned to the study hall, and Ilfa did not return, but went to engage in business instead. By the time that Ilfa came back from his business travels, Rabbi Yoḥanan had been appointed head of the academy, and his financial situation had improved.

▶ 4:11

אמרו לו: אי אתיב מר וגריס, לא הוה מליך מר. אזל תלא נפשיה באסקריא דספינתא, אמר: אי איכא דשאיל לי במתניתא דרבי חייא

His colleagues said to Ilfa: If the Master had sat and studied, instead of going off to his business ventures, wouldn’t the Master have been appointed head of the academy? Ilfa went and suspended himself from the mast [askariya] of a ship, saying: If there is anyone who can ask me a question concerning a baraita of Rabbi Ḥiyya and Rabbi Oshaya, and I do not resolve his problem from a mishna, I will fall from the mast of this ship and be drowned. Ilfa sought to demonstrate that despite the time he had spent in business, he still retained his extensive Torah knowledge.

▶ 4:50

ורבי אושעיא ולא פשיטנא ליה ממתניתין, נפילנא מאסקריא דספינתא וטבענא.

▶ 5:21

אתא ההוא סבא, תנא ליה: האומר תנו שקל לבניי בשבת, והן ראויין לתת להם סלע — נותנין להם סלע. ואם אמר: אל תתנו להם אלא שקל — אין

A certain old man came and taught a baraita before him: If there is a man who, upon his deathbed, says in his will: Give a shekel to my sons every week, but this is a situation where, based on their needs, they are fit for the court to give them a sela, i.e., double the amount, they give them a sela. When the dying man mentioned a shekel, he presumably meant that they should be given a sum in accordance with their actual requirements, not that specific amount. But if he said: Give them only a shekel, the court gives them only a shekel and no more.

▶ 7:16

נותנין להם אלא שקל.

▶ 7:49

אם אמר: אם מתו ירשו אחרים תחתיהם — בין שאמר ״תנו״ בין שאמר ״אל תתנו״ — אין נותנין להם אלא שקל. אמר ליה:

The baraita further states that if one said: If my sons die, others should inherit their portion in their stead, regardless of whether he said: Give them a shekel, or whether he said: Give them only a shekel, then the court gives his sons only a shekel per week, as their father clearly stated that he wishes to give his sons only a specific stipend and that he intends to leave the bulk of his property to others. Ilfa said to the old man: In accordance with whose opinion is this ruling? It is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Meir, who said: It is a mitzva to fulfill the statement of the dead. This entire baraita can be explained based on a principle that appears in a mishna: In all cases, one should try to execute the wishes of the deceased.

▶ 8:10

הא מני — רבי מאיר היא, דאמר: מצוה לקיים דברי המת.

▶ 8:45

אמרו עליו על נחום איש גם זו שהיה סומא משתי עיניו, גדם משתי ידיו, קיטע משתי רגליו, וכל גופו מלא שחין. והיה מוטל בבית רעוע,

§ The Gemara relates another story about a rundown building. They said about Naḥum of Gam Zu that he was blind in both eyes, both his arms were amputated, both his legs were amputated, and his entire body was covered in boils. And he was lying in a dilapidated house, and legs of his bed were placed in buckets of water so that ants should not climb onto him, as he was unable to keep them off in any other manner. Once his students sought to remove his bed from the house and afterward remove his other vessels. He said to them: My sons, remove the vessels first, and afterward remove my bed, as I can guarantee you that as long as I am in the house, the house will not fall. Indeed they removed the vessels and afterward they removed his bed, and immediately the house collapsed.

▶ 9:23

ורגלי מטתו מונחין בספלין של מים כדי שלא יעלו עליו נמלים. פעם אחת בקשו תלמידיו לפנות מטתו, ואחר כך לפנות את הכלים. אמר להם: בניי, פנו את הכלים,

▶ 10:33

ואחר כך פנו את מטתי, שמובטח לכם שכל זמן שאני בבית אין הבית נופל. פינו את הכלים ואחר כך פינו את מטתו, ונפל הבית.

▶ 11:07

אמרו לו תלמידיו: רבי, וכי מאחר שצדיק גמור אתה, למה עלתה לך כך? אמר להם: בניי, אני גרמתי לעצמי. שפעם אחת הייתי מהלך בדרך לבית חמי,

His students said to him: Rabbi, since you are evidently a wholly righteous man, as we have just seen that as long as you were in your house it did not fall, why has this suffering befallen you? He said to them: My sons, I brought it upon myself. Naḥum of Gam Zu related to them the following: As once I was traveling along the road to my father-in-law’s house, and I had with me a load distributed among three donkeys, one of food, one of drink, and one of delicacies. A poor person came and stood before me in the road, saying: My rabbi, sustain me. I said to him: Wait until I unload the donkey, after which I will give you something to eat. However, I had not managed to unload the donkey before his soul left his body.

▶ 11:41

והיה עמי משוי שלשה חמורים, אחד של מאכל, ואחד של משתה, ואחד של מיני מגדים. בא עני אחד ועמד לי בדרך, ואמר לי: רבי, פרנסני. אמרתי לו:

▶ 12:10

המתן עד שאפרוק מן החמור. לא הספקתי לפרוק מן החמור עד שיצתה נשמתו.

▶ 12:46

הלכתי ונפלתי על פניו, ואמרתי: עיני שלא חסו על עיניך — יסומו, ידיי שלא חסו על ידיך — יתגדמו, רגלי שלא חסו על רגליך — יתקטעו.

I went and fell upon his face and said: May my eyes, which had no compassion on your eyes, be blinded; may my hands, which had no compassion on your hands, be amputated; may my legs, which had no compassion on your legs, be amputated. And my mind did not rest until I said: May my whole body be covered in boils. Naḥum of Gam Zu prayed that his suffering might atone for his failure. His students said to him: Even so, woe to us that we have seen you in this state. He said to them: Woe is me if you had not seen me in this state, as this suffering atones for me.

▶ 13:10

ולא נתקררה דעתי עד שאמרתי: כל גופי יהא מלא שחין. אמרו לו: אוי לנו שראינוך בכך! אמר להם: אוי לי אם לא ראיתוני בכך.

▶ 14:51

ואמאי קרו ליה נחום איש גם זו — דכל מילתא דהוה סלקא ליה, אמר: גם זו לטובה. זימנא חדא בעו לשדורי ישראל דורון לבי קיסר, אמרו:

The Gemara inquires: And why did they call him Naḥum of Gam Zu? The reason is that with regard to any matter that occurred to him, he would say: This too is for the good [gam zu letova]. Once, the Jews wished to send a gift [doron] to the house of the emperor. They said: Who should go and present this gift? Let Naḥum of Gam Zu go, as he is accustomed to miracles. They sent with him a chest [sifta] full of jewels and pearls, and he went and spent the night in a certain inn. During the night, these residents of the inn arose and took all of the precious jewels and pearls from the chest, and filled it with earth. The next day, when he saw what had happened, Naḥum of Gam Zu said: This too is for the good.

▶ 15:25

מאן ייזיל — ייזיל נחום איש גם זו, דמלומד בניסין הוא. שדרו בידיה מלא סיפטא דאבנים טובות ומרגליות. אזל, בת בההוא דירא.

▶ 15:45

בליליא קמו הנך דיוראי ושקלינהו לסיפטיה ומלונהו עפרא.

▶ 16:10

כי מטא התם, שרינהו לסיפטי, חזנהו דמלו עפרא. בעא מלכא למקטלינהו לכולהו, אמר: קא מחייכו בי יהודאי. אמר: גם זו לטובה.

When he arrived there, at the ruler’s palace, they opened the chest and saw that it was filled with earth. The king wished to put all the Jewish emissaries to death. He said: The Jews are mocking me. Naḥum of Gam Zu said: This too is for the good. Elijah the Prophet came and appeared before the ruler as one of his ministers. He said to the ruler: Perhaps this earth is from the earth of their father Abraham. As when he threw earth, it turned into swords, and when he threw stubble, it turned into arrows, as it is written in a prophecy that the Sages interpreted this verse as a reference to Abraham: “His sword makes them as the dust, his bow as the driven stubble” (Isaiah 41:2).

▶ 16:50

אתא אליהו אדמי ליה כחד מינייהו, אמר ליה: דלמא הא עפרא מעפרא דאברהם אבוהון הוא, דכי הוה שדי עפרא — הוו סייפי, גילי — הוו גירי, דכתיב:

▶ 17:23

״יתן כעפר חרבו כקש נדף קשתו״.

▶ 17:35

הויא חדא מדינתא דלא מצו למיכבשה, בדקו מיניה וכבשוה. עיילו לבי גנזיה ומלוהו לסיפטיה אבנים טובות ומרגליות, ושדרוהו ביקרא רבה.

There was one province that the Romans were unable to conquer. They took some of this earth, tested it by throwing it at their enemies, and conquered that province. When the ruler saw that this earth indeed had miraculous powers, his servants entered his treasury and filled Naḥum of Gam Zu’s chest with precious jewels and pearls and sent him off with great honor.

▶ 18:15

כי אתו, ביתו בההוא דיורא, אמרו ליה: מאי אייתית בהדך דעבדי לך יקרא כולי האי? אמר להו: מאי דשקלי מהכא אמטי להתם.

When Naḥum of Gam Zu came to spend the night at that same inn, the residents said to him: What did you bring with you to the emperor that he bestowed upon you such great honor? He said to them: That which I took from here, I brought there. When they heard this, the residents of the inn thought that the soil upon which their house stood had miraculous powers. They tore down their inn and brought the soil underneath to the king’s palace. They said to him: That earth that was brought here was from our property. The miracle had been performed only in the merit of Naḥum of Gam Zu. The emperor tested the inn’s soil in battle, and it was not found to have miraculous powers, and he had these residents of the inn put to death.

▶ 18:35

סתרו לדירייהו ואמטינהו לבי מלכא, אמרו ליה: האי עפרא דאייתי הכא — מדידן הוא. בדקוה ולא אשכחוה, וקטלינהו להנך דיוראי.

▶ 19:18

אי זו היא דבר — עיר המוציאה חמש מאות רגלי כו׳. תנו רבנן: עיר המוציאה חמש מאות ואלף רגלי, כגון כפר עכו,

§ The mishna taught: What is considered a plague of pestilence? If it is a city that sends out five hundred infantrymen, and three dead are removed from it on three consecutive days, one dead per day, this is a plague of pestilence. The Sages taught: If a city that sends out fifteen hundred infantrymen, i.e., one that has a population of at least fifteen hundred men, e.g., the village of Akko, and nine dead are removed from it on three consecutive days, i.e., three dead per day, this is considered a plague of pestilence.

▶ 19:52

ויצאו הימנה תשעה מתים בשלשה ימים זה אחר זה — הרי זה דבר.

▶ 20:09

ביום אחד או בארבעה ימים — אין זה דבר. ועיר המוציאה חמש מאות רגלי, כגון כפר עמיקו, ויצאו הימנה שלשה מתים בשלשה ימים זה

If all nine died on a single day, while none died on the other days, or if the nine died over a period of four days, this is not a plague of pestilence. And a city that sends out five hundred infantrymen, for example, the village of Amiko, and three dead are removed from it on three consecutive days, this is a plague of pestilence.

▶ 20:40

אחר זה — הרי זה דבר.

תענית כא · עמוד ב

▶ 20:46

ביום אחד או בארבעה ימים — אין זה דבר.

If all three died on one day or over four days, this is not a plague of pestilence.

▶ 20:51

דרוקרת, עיר המוציאה חמש מאות רגלי הואי, ויצאו ממנה שלשה מתים ביום אחד. גזר רב נחמן בר רב חסדא תעניתא. אמר רב נחמן בר יצחק:

In explanation of the counterintuitive ruling that many deaths in one day is not indicative of a plague, the Gemara relates: Drokart was a city that sent out five hundred infantrymen, and three dead were removed from it on one day. Rav Naḥman bar Rav Ḥisda decreed a fast on account of the plague. Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak said: In accordance with whose opinion did you declare this fast? It must be in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Meir.

▶ 21:24

כמאן — כרבי מאיר,

▶ 21:29

דאמר: ריחק נגיחותיו — חייב, קירב נגיחותיו — לא כל שכן?!

This is related to the definition of a forewarned ox, an animal that has gored enough times to be considered a dangerous beast that requires careful supervision, as Rabbi Meir said: The owner of an ox is liable to pay full damages if its acts of goring were separated, i.e., if it gored three times on three consecutive days, as claimed by the Rabbis. If its acts of goring were near each other, performed on a single day, is it not all the more so that this animal should be classified as a forewarned ox? However, Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak continued, this represents a minority opinion. Just as Rabbi Meir’s reasoning is rejected for halakha in the case of an ox, so too it is rejected with regard to a plague.

▶ 24:30

אמר ליה רב נחמן בר רב חסדא לרב נחמן בר יצחק: ליקום מר ליתי לגבן. אמר ליה: תנינא, רבי יוסי אומר: לא מקומו של אדם מכבדו,

Upon hearing this impressive argument, Rav Naḥman bar Rav Ḥisda said to Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak: Let the Master arise and come to live with us as our community leader. Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak said to him: We already learned in a baraita that Rabbi Yosei says: It is not the place of a person that honors him; rather, the person honors his place, as we found with regard to Mount Sinai, that as long as the Divine Presence rested upon it, the Torah said: “Neither let the flocks nor the herds feed before that mount” (Exodus 34:3). Once the Divine Presence departed from the mountain, the Torah said: “When the shofar sounds long they shall come up to the mount” (Exodus 19:13). This indicates that the sanctity was not inherent to the place but was due to the Divine Presence resting there.

▶ 25:52

אלא אדם מכבד את מקומו. שכן מצינו בהר סיני, שכל זמן שהשכינה שרויה עליו, אמרה תורה: ״גם הצאן והבקר אל ירעו אל מול ההר ההוא״,

▶ 28:08

נסתלקה שכינה ממנו, אמרה תורה: ״במשך היבל המה יעלו בהר״.

▶ 28:30

וכן מצינו באהל מועד שבמדבר, שכל זמן שהוא נטוי אמרה תורה: ״וישלחו מן המחנה כל צרוע״, הוגללו הפרוכות — הותרו זבין ומצורעים ליכנס שם.

And we likewise found with regard to the Tent of Meeting that was in the wilderness, that whenever it was erected, the Torah said: “That they put out of the camp every leper” (Numbers 5:2). Once the curtain was rolled up and the Tent of Meeting was prepared for travel, zavim and lepers were permitted to enter the place where it had stood. The place itself had no intrinsic sanctity; rather, it was sacred only because the Divine Presence was there. Accordingly, Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak maintained that there is no reason for him to move places to receive honor.

▶ 28:59

אמר ליה: אי הכי, ניקום אנא לגבי מר. אמר ליה: מוטב יבא מנה בן פרס אצל מנה בן מנה, ואל יבא מנה בן מנה אצל מנה בן פרס.

Rav Naḥman bar Rav Ḥisda said to Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak: If so, let me arise and come to the Master, to learn Torah from you. Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak said to him: It is better that one hundred dinars that is the son of a peras, fifty dinars, should come to one hundred dinars that is the son of one hundred dinars; but one hundred dinars that is the son of one hundred dinars, should not come to one hundred dinars that is the son of a peras. In other words, although Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak was a learned scholar, comparable to one hundred dinars, it was nevertheless more appropriate for him to come to Rav Naḥman bar Rav Ḥisda. Whereas Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak was the son of a peras, an ordinary man, Rav Naḥman bar Rav Ḥisda was the son of a scholar.

▶ 29:42

בסורא הוות דברתא, בשיבבותיה דרב לא הוות דברתא. סבור מינה, משום זכותיה דרב דנפיש. איתחזי להו בחילמא: רב דנפישא זכותיה טובא — הא מילתא זוטרא ליה לרב. אלא,

The Gemara relates another story involving a plague: Once there was a plague of pestilence in Sura, but in the neighborhood of Rav there was no pestilence. The people therefore thought that this was due to Rav’s great merit. However, it was revealed to them in a dream that Rav’s merit was too great and this matter too small for the merit of Rav to be involved. Rather, his neighborhood was spared due to the acts of kindness of a certain man, who would lend his hoe [mara] and shovel [zevila] to prepare sites for burial.

▶ 30:35

משום ההוא גברא דמשייל מרא וזבילא לקבורה.

▶ 30:51

בדרוקרת הוות דליקתא, ובשיבבותיה דרב הונא לא הוות דליקתא. סבור מינה, בזכותא דרב הונא דנפיש. איתחזי להו בחילמא: האי זוטרא ליה לרב הונא,

The Gemara relates a similar incident. In Drokart there was a fire, but in the neighborhood of Rav Huna there was no fire. The people therefore thought that this was due to Rav Huna’s great merit. It was revealed to them in a dream that this matter was too small for the merit of Rav Huna to have played a role. Rather, it was due to a certain woman who heats her oven and lends it, i.e., the use of her oven, to her neighbors.

▶ 31:27

אלא משום ההיא איתתא דמחממא תנורא ומשיילא לשיבבותיה.

▶ 31:35

אמרו ליה לרב יהודה: אתו קמצי. גזר תעניתא. אמרו ליה: לא קא מפסדן. אמר להו: זוודא אייתו בהדייהו?

They said to Rav Yehuda: Locusts have come to our region. Rav Yehuda decreed a fast. They said to him: They are not destroying anything, as they are eating only a little. He said to them: Have they brought provisions with them, that they have something else to eat? Even if they are not damaging your crops now, they will certainly eat them soon.

▶ 32:06

אמרו ליה לרב יהודה: איכא מותנא בחזירי. גזר תעניתא. נימא קסבר רב יהודה מכה משולחת ממין אחד משולחת מכל המינין? לא, שאני חזירי — דדמיין מעייהו לבני אינשי.

On another occasion, they said to Rav Yehuda: There is pestilence among the pigs. Rav Yehuda decreed a fast. The Gemara asks: Let us say that Rav Yehuda maintains that a plague affecting one species will come to affect all species, and that is why he decreed a fast. The Gemara answers: No, in other cases there is no cause for concern. However, pigs are different, as their intestines are similar to those of humans. Consequently, their disease might spread to people.

▶ 32:57

אמרו ליה לשמואל: איכא מותנא בי חוזאי. גזר תעניתא. אמרי ליה: והא מרחק! אמר: ליכא מעברא הכא דפסיק ליה.

They said to Shmuel: There is pestilence in the region of Bei Ḥozai, which is quite a distance from Babylonia. Shmuel decreed a fast. They said to him: But it is far from here. He said: There is no crossing here that will stop the pestilence, and therefore there is cause for concern that it will reach us.

▶ 33:26

אמרו ליה לרב נחמן: איכא מותנא בארעא דישראל. גזר תעניתא אמר: אם גבירה לוקה, שפחה לא כל שכן!

They said to Rav Naḥman: There is pestilence in Eretz Yisrael. Rav Naḥman decreed a fast in Babylonia, saying: If the lady of the house, i.e., Eretz Yisrael, is afflicted, is it not all the more so that the maidservant, Babylonia, will be afflicted?

▶ 34:22

טעמא דגבירה ושפחה, הא שפחה ושפחה — לא. והא אמרו ליה לשמואל: איכא מותנא בי חוזאי, גזר תעניתא! שאני התם, כיון דאיכא שיירתא דלווי ואתיא בהדיה.

The Gemara asks: The reason for this ruling is apparently only because Eretz Yisrael is a lady in comparison to the Diaspora, which is likened to a maidservant. It may be inferred from this that in a case involving a maidservant and a maidservant, i.e., two places in the Diaspora, there is no reason to fast. But in the previous story, when they said to Shmuel: There is pestilence in the region of Bei Ḥozai, he decreed a fast in Neharde’a, despite the fact that Neharde’a is not considered a lady with respect to Bei Ḥozai. The Gemara answers: It is different there. Since there are caravans that regularly travel from Bei Ḥozai to Neharde’a, the pestilence will join and accompany them in the caravans.

▶ 35:04

אבא אומנא הוה אתי ליה שלמא ממתיבתא דרקיעא כל יומא, ולאביי כל מעלי יומא דשבתא, לרבא כל מעלי יומא דכיפורי.

§ Apropos the above stories that deal with the merits of ordinary people, the Gemara relates: Abba the Bloodletter would receive greetings from the yeshiva on High every day, and Abaye would receive these greetings every Shabbat eve, and Rava would receive greetings only once a year on Yom Kippur eve. Abaye was distressed due to Abba the Bloodletter, as he did not understand why Abba received greater honor than he did. They said to him: You are unable to perform what he does, and therefore you do not merit the same honor.

▶ 35:25

הוה קא חלשא דעתיה דאביי משום דאבא אומנא. אמרו ליה: לא מצית למיעבד כעובדיה.

▶ 36:14

ומאי הוו עובדיה דאבא אומנא — דכי הוה עביד מילתא, הוה מחית גברי לחוד ונשי לחוד, ואית ליה לבושא דאית ביה קרנא דהוות בזיעא כי כוסילתא.

The Gemara asks: And what were these righteous deeds of Abba the Bloodletter? The Gemara explains that when he would perform a matter of bloodletting, he would bring in men separately from women, for reasons of modesty. And he had a special garment that had a slit in the place of the incision [kusilta] where the bloodletting instrument was inserted. When a woman came to him, he would have her dress in that garment, so that he would not see her exposed. And furthermore, he had a hidden place where he worked, where customers would place the coins [peshitei] that he would take as his fee. In this manner, one who had money would throw it there, while one who did not have money was not embarrassed.

▶ 36:26

כי הוות אתיא ליה איתתא, הוה מלביש לה כי היכי דלא ניסתכל בה. ואית ליה דוכתא דצניעא דשדי ביה פשיטי דשקיל, דאית ליה — שדי ביה,

▶ 38:11

דלית ליה — לא מיכסיף.

▶ 39:12

כי הוה אתרמי ליה צורבא מרבנן, אגרא מיניה לא שקיל. ובתר דקאי, יהיב ליה פשיטי ואמר ליה: זיל אברי נפשך. יומא חד שדר אביי זוגא דרבנן למיבדקיה.

When a Torah scholar came to him for bloodletting, he would take no pay from him, and after the scholar arose, Abba would give him money and say to him: Go and purchase food with this money to heal yourself, as it is important to eat healthy food after bloodletting. One day, Abaye sent a pair of Sages to investigate the extent of Abba the Bloodletter’s righteousness. Abba the Bloodletter sat them down, and gave them food to eat, and gave them something to drink. And at night he spread out mats [bistarkei] for them to sleep on.

אותבינהו ואכלינהו ואשקינהו ומך להו ביסתרקי בליליא.